El odio al otro a través de la visión del mundo de un movimiento conservador canadiense. El Christian Heritage Party en Internet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article aims to capture the political imaginary of a christian canadian neoconservative party. The socio-anthropological analysis of the content of the Christian Heritage Party website describes the etiological, ontological and axiological grammars that shapes the worldview of this political party. It shows how they mobilize the symbolic codes of the civil sphere to defile certain institutions (media, justice, parliament) or groups (elites, religious or gender minorities) and thus strengthen the contours of what would be a "good" Canadian society. These movements and actors are often sent outside the civil sphere and reduced to a pathology of the social system. However, these movements do not revolve in an independent orbit. They produce symbols and use communication institutions to disseminate their representations of good and evil through speeches. They justify their contempt for social movements, actors (especially leftist, LGBTQ activists, judges, medias) in the name of freedom, equality or justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".