MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187533761

Diversidad de mantis (Insecta: Mantodea) de Norteamérica, con una clave de identificación ilustrada para familias y géneros.

2020· article· es· W3187533761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manuel de Luna, Erick Hernández-Baltazar

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín de la SEA · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantisChecklistZoologyGeographyBiologyHumanitiesPhilosophyPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolSe presenta un listado actualizado de mantis (Insecta: Mantodea) de Canada, EE. UU. y Mexico, registrandose 76 especies agrupadas en 29 generos y 12 familias. Ademas se propone una clave de identificacion ilustrada para familias y generos de la region. EnglishAn updated checklist of mantises (Insecta: Mantodea) of Canada, USA and Mexico is presented, being registered 76 species grouped in 29 genera and 12 families. An illustrated identification key to families and genera of the region is also proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín de la SEASame topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207