Transitions, Flow and Outflow of Students in the Greek Education in the Diaspora
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article the author examines the situation of two kinds of schools in the Greek diaspora: those incorporated into the educational system of the host country, namely the Socrates school in Chicago, the Socrates school in Montreal and the Alphington Grammar school of the Greek Community in Melbourne, and the purely Greek schools of Germany which have stayed outside the system and operate alongside with it. His assessment of the first is quite positive, regarding the transition made by these three schools, as well as the transition and progress of the students. On the other hand, the author regards the discrepancies and lack of correspondence of the purely Greek schools of Germany with the society and institutions of the host country and of Greece itself, as a failure. Even when the students of these schools are admitted to Greece’s universities, their graduation and subsequent move into the labour force remain uncertain. His analyses of the two cases allow him to form a position on the subject, namely, that the educational system functions effectively only when it is in correspondence with the needs and functions of the wider social system and it conforms to the other systems of the society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".