Seasonal Snowpack Classification Based on Physical Properties Using Near-Infrared Proximal Hyperspectral Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an innovative method for classifying the physical properties of the seasonal snowpack using near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imagery to discriminate the optical classes of snow at different degrees of metamorphosis. This imaging system leads to fast and non-invasive assessment of snow properties. Indeed, the spectral similarity of two samples indicates the similarity of their chemical composition and physical characteristics. This can be used to distinguish, without a priori recognition, between different classes of snow solely based on spectral information. A multivariate data analysis approach was used to validate this hypothesis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was first applied to the NIR spectral data to analyze field data distribution and to select the spectral range to be exploited in the classification. Next, an unsupervised classification was performed on the NIR spectral data to select the number of classes. Finally, a confusion matrix was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the classification. The results allowed us to distinguish three snow classes of typical shape and size (weakly, moderately, and strongly metamorphosed snow). The evaluation of the proposed approach showed that it is possible to classify snow with a success rate of 85% and a kappa index of 0.75. This illustrates the potential of NIR hyperspectral imagery to distinguish between three snow classes with satisfactory success rates. This work will open new perspectives for the modelling of physical parameters of snow using spectral data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".