P–533 Effects of sex chromosomal complement, XX, XO, or XY, on the transcriptome and development of mouse oocytes during follicular growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Study question How does the sex chromosome complement affect the transcriptome and development of oocytes during follicular growth in the mouse ovary? Summary answer Highly expressed X-linked genes adjust their transcript levels according to the X dosage. Y-linked genes affect the transcript levels of some X-linked and autosomal genes. What is known already Female mice carrying XO and XY chromosomes on the C57BL/6J (B6) genetic background are healthy but encounter subfertility and infertility, respectively. Our previous results have shown that the XY oocyte is defective in its cytoplasm; its replacement with that of an XX oocyte at the GV stage allows for production of healthy offspring after fertilization. Since transcription is shut down in the oocyte by the end of growth phase, the mRNAs and proteins necessary for meiotic progression and early embryonic development are accumulated during follicular growth. Study design, size, duration 30 oocytes of 50–59 μm diameter were pooled for each genotype in biological triplicate and subjected to RNA-Sequencing. Total RNA extracted from 10–30 pooled oocytes of each size range and genotype in biological triplicate were subjected to qRT-PCR. All experiments were performed between 2019–2021. Participants/materials, setting, methods XY and XO females were generated by cross between B6 females with B6.YTIR and B6.XPafY males, respectively. Oocytes in the growth phase were collected at 8–18 days postpartum (dpp), whereas fully-grown oocytes were collected at 27–29 dpp after injection with equine chorionic gonadotropin. Oocytes of 50–59 μm diameter were subjected to RNA-Sequencing using a version of SmartSeq2, followed by DEG analyses. Transcript levels in the oocytes of various diameters were determined by qRT-PCR. Main results and the role of chance Chromatin configuration, mitochondrial distribution, and de novo transcription were largely comparable among the XX, XO, and XY oocytes smaller than 60 µm. Three way comparisons of RNA-Seq data in the oocytes of 50–59 μm revealed; (1) 13.8% of X-linked DEGs showed the transcript levels in correspond to the X chromosome dosage; (2) 9 genes on the Y short arm and 2 genes near the distal end of the Y long arm were highly expressed in XY oocytes; (3) transcript levels of X- or autosomal homologs were affected by the XY complement compared to XX and XO oocytes; and (4) 54 and 39 X-linked and autosomal genes show higher and lower transcript levels, respectively, in XY oocytes compared to XX and XO oocytes. The results of qRT-PCR of selected genes revealed distinct dynamic changes in transcript levels in the oocyte during follicular growth. Data of RNA-Seq were statistically analyzed using R Bioconductor limma package for differentially expressed genes having Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P values lower than 0.01 and log2 fold change higher than 1. All data of qRT-PCR were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test. Limitations, reasons for caution In humans, most XO females die in utero and those who reach the term suffer from congenital abnormalities and infertility (Turner’s syndrome). However, the severer phenotype can be attributed to somatic cells with a greater number of genes that escape from X chromosome inactivation in humans than mice. Wider implications of the findings: XO and XY mice provide animal models for investigating the consequence of X haplodeficiency in the female germline, independent of somatic defects. Furthermore, XY female mice provide a unique opportunity for examining whether and how Y-linked genes are transcribed outside the male germline. Trial registration number Not applicable
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".