MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187717227 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500420

A Novel Resource Reliability-Aware Infrastructure Manager for Containerized Network Functions

2021· article· en· W3187717227 on OpenAlexaff
Zhuonan Huang, Nancy Samaan, Ahmed Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvisioningReservationComputer sciencePoolingWorkloadSoftware deploymentResource allocationResource (disambiguation)Resource management (computing)Service (business)Reliability (semiconductor)IdleVirtual networkComputer networkBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major challenge to the anticipated large scale deployment of virtual network functions (VNFs) at the network edge (NE) is the ability to efficiently allocate and manage its scarce resources to meet these functions workload fluctuations. In this paper, we describe a novel containerized infrastructure manager (cIM) that extends current managers, such as Kubernetes, with the necessary building blocks to provide an accurate resource allocation service to containerized VNFs at scale. The proposed cIM treats the containerized VNF components (cNFCs), as atomic special purpose functions that can be rapidly deployed to form complex network services. The main component of the proposed cIM, the resource reservation manager (RRM), employs concepts of risk pooling in the insurance industry to accurately reserve the needed resources for the hosting containers and meet anticipated cNFCs demand fluctuation. The reserved quota of re-sources ensures the desired availability level of the cNFCs without over-provisioning the scarce resources of the NE. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed cIM significantly improve the performance of the cNFCs and guarantees their availability with minimal resource reservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207