MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187783601 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac1cc5

Corrosion Inhibition of Mg Alloy ZEK100 Sheet Metal by Dissolved Lithium Carbonate

2021· article· en· W3187783601 on OpenAlexafffund
Basem Zaghloul, J.R. Kish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCorrosionDissolutionAnodePolarization (electrochemistry)ChlorideInorganic chemistryAlloyMetalCathodeMaterials scienceLithium chlorideSaturation (graph theory)ChemistryMetallurgyElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extent of corrosion inhibition of Mg alloy ZEK100 in 100 mM NaCl (aq) imparted by dissolved Li 2 CO 3 (aq), with a particular focus on Li incorporation into the surface film that forms under activated anodic dissolution (anodic polarization) was determined. Dissolved Li 2 CO 3 reduces corrosion by a factor of ∼12 when added at a concentration (100 mM) just below saturation. Effective inhibition involves suppressing the transition to filament-like corrosion, and associated anode/cathode activation, initiating at local breakdown sites. Such suppression is linked to the formation of Li-doped MgO as a corrosion product film during activated anodic dissolution. When formed by anodic polarization, the film composition also significantly affects the chloride ion distribution with the film. Without Li incorporation, chloride ions tend to enrich at the film/metal interface, whereas with Li incorporation, chloride ions tend to be uniformly distributed within the film.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207