MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187825182 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500418

Reliable Millimeter Wave Communication for IoT Devices

2021· article· en· W3187825182 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Ibrahim, Walaa Hamouda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceStochastic geometryInternet of ThingsBase stationEnergy consumptionExtremely high frequencyComputer networkMillimeterSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Non-line-of-sight propagationReal-time computingWirelessTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a nearest line-of-sight relay (NLR) selection technique for internet of things (IoT) devices in millimeter wave (mmWave) relaying systems. We present a tractable analytical framework to characterize the network connectivity for the proposed technique using tools from stochastic geometry. Moreover, we investigate the impact of the relay-selected region and the distance between the base station and IoT device on the network connectivity of mmWave relaying systems. The analytical results unveil a high degree of accuracy which is confirmed by extensive simulations at different relay densities, blockage densities, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) thresholds. Results obtained via both simulations and analyses reveal the trade-off between the network connectivity and the energy consumption of IoT devices. Results also reveal a significant impact of blockage density and controlling the relay-selected region on the network connectivity and energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207