Considerations for Training an Artificial Neural Network for Particle Type Identification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the nuclear sciences and radiation detection fields, the differentiation between gamma-ray and neutron interactions inside a detector volume continues to be an area of active research. Historically, the primary mechanism for conducting particle identification has been pulse shape discrimination (PSD). However, almost all variations of this technique rely on only two factors: the area of the tail and the total area of the pulse. In the last decade, the emergence of advanced machine learning techniques, most specifically artificial neural networks (ANNs), offers a unique opportunity to capitalize on the entirety of the waveform. But such techniques appear highly reliant on the quality of datasets used for training. Our research addresses this challenge to quantify the relative performances of networks trained on a variety of datasets and subjected to the same test. Furthermore, we offer an analysis of the portability of a network trained on one detector to a similar detector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it