Non-relativistic quark model under external magnetic and Aharanov–Bohm (AB) fields in the presence of temperature-dependent confined Cornell potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dissociation of quarkonia in a thermal QCD medium in the background of Aharanov–Bohm (AB) and strong magnetic fields was investigated. For this purpose, the Schrödinger equation with charged quarkonium in the Cornell potential under the influence of the AB flux and an external magnetic fields directed along the z-axis was employed. Using the Nikiforov–Uvarov (NU) method, the energy eigenvalue was obtained. The effects of temperature, AB flux, and external magnetic field were studied. The study shows that the dissociation energies of the 1S states of charmonium and bottomonium decrease with increasing temperature, AB flux, and external magnetic field. In addition, the quarkonium melts faster in a hot medium in the presence of an AB flux and an external magnetic field. We found that charmonium melts at 13.79 [Formula: see text] and bottomonium melts at 99.48 [Formula: see text]. A comparison was conducted with other studies. Thus, the present non-relativistic model provides satisfactory results for the dissociation binding energy in a hot medium when the AB flux and external magnetic fields are included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".