Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishIn an investigation about «the come to the writing» (according to the expression of Luce Irigaray) of Laure Conan, the first novelist from Quebec, we observe the previous conditions to the writing. The first of these conditions is obviously the reading. To read, it is necessary to have learnt to read. We describe the history of the education in Quebec during the 19th century, covering from the primary education until the University. We observe with attention the situation objectively more difficult of the women in this process of intellectual training. e analyse the places of the public reading with the bookshops, the libraries, the libraries of the parishes and the distinct institutes. Finally, we understand that these different physical places materialise the fight of the different intellectual currents that face to in the heart of the French Canadian society of this period. These different places stage the opposition of the Catholics by a part and of the liberals on the other hand. francaisDans une recherche plus large sur «la venue a l’ecriture» (selon l’expression de Luce Irigaray) de Laure Conan, la premiere romanciere quebecoise, nous avons du nous interroger sur les conditions prealables a l’ecriture. La premiere de ces exigences est bien evidemment la lecture. Or, pour lire, il faut avant tout apprendre a le faire, nous nous arreterons donc ici sur l’histoire de l’education au Quebec a la fin du XIXeme siecle de l’enseignement primaire a l’Universite, en ayant toujours a l’esprit la situation particuliere de la femme qui souhaite se former. Puis, nous nous pencherons plus systematiquement sur les lieux de la lecture publique en observant successivement, les librairies, les bibliotheques publiques et les bibliotheques paroissiales, les cabinets de lecture et les differents Instituts. Enfin, nous observerons que ces differents endroits physiques ne font rien d’autre que de materialiser la lutte des differents courants intellectuels qui s’affrontent au cœur de la societe canadienne francaise de l’epoque. Ces differents lieux mettent en scene l’opposition des catholiques de sensibilite ultramontaine d’une part, et des liberaux d’autre part.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".