MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188081561 · doi:10.1103/physreve.104.044122

Maximal fluctuation exploitation in Gaussian information engines

2021· article· en· W3188081561 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph N. E. Lucero, Jannik Ehrich, John Bechhoefer, David A. Sivak

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsFoundational Questions InstituteSilicon Valley Community Foundation
KeywordsLimit (mathematics)Second law of thermodynamicsComputer scienceWork (physics)Energy (signal processing)Heat engineSimple (philosophy)GaussianEnergy transformationStatistical physicsPhysicsMathematicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the connections between information and thermodynamics has been among the most visible applications of stochastic thermodynamics. While recent theoretical advances have established that the second law of thermodynamics sets limits on information-to-energy conversion, it is currently unclear to what extent real systems can achieve the predicted theoretical limits. Using a simple model of an information engine that has recently been experimentally implemented, we explore the limits of information-to-energy conversion when an information engine's benefit is limited to output energy that can be stored. We find that restricting the engine's output in this way can limit its ability to convert information to energy. Nevertheless, a feedback control that inputs work can allow the engine to store energy at the highest achievable rate. These results sharpen our theoretical understanding of the limits of real systems that convert information to energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207