MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188085269 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3102077

Exploiting Cascaded Ensemble of Features for the Detection of Tuberculosis Using Chest Radiographs

2021· article· en· W3188085269 on OpenAlexafffund
A. F. M. Saif, Tamjid Imtiaz, Celia Shahnaz, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTuberculosisBenchmark (surveying)Task (project management)Machine learningPopularityDeep learningFeature extractionMulti-task learningEnsemble learningFeature (linguistics)Communicable diseaseMedicinePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable disease that is one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide according to the World Health Organization. Hence, Early detection of Tuberculosis is an important task to save millions of lives from this life threatening disease. For diagnosing TB from chest X-Ray, different handcrafted features were utilized previously and they provided high accuracy even in a small dataset. However, at present, deep learning (DL) gains popularity in many computer vision tasks because of their better performance in comparison to the traditional manual feature extraction based machine learning approaches and Tuberculosis detection task is not an exception. Considering all these facts, a cascaded ensembling method is proposed that combines both the hand-engineered and the deep learning-based features for the Tuberculosis detection task. To make the proposed model more generalized, rotation-invariant augmentation techniques are introduced which is found very effective in this task. By using the proposed method, outstanding performance is achieved through extensive simulation on two benchmark datasets (99.7% and 98.4% accuracy on Shenzhen and Montgomery County datasets respectively) that verifies the effectiveness of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207