MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188089627 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500776

An Efficient Real-Time Vehicle Re-Identification Scheme Using Urban Surveillance Videos

2021· article· en· W3188089627 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiren Ma, Azzedine Boukerche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceConcatenation (mathematics)Discriminative modelBenchmark (surveying)Artificial intelligenceIdentification (biology)Feature extractionScheme (mathematics)Feature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the explosive use of surveillance and onboard cameras, vision-based Vehicle Re-identification (VReID) has attracted widespread attention. The goal of VReID is to search and identify the target vehicle from a large number of images. An efficient VReID model can help the police make fast decisions and improve regional security. The major challenge of the VReID is to distinguish the subtle visual difference between different vehicles. In this work, we propose a Compact Attention Unit (CAU) that relies on a single attention map to extract the discriminative local features of the vehicle. We add two CAUs to the truncated ResNet to construct a small but efficient VReID model, ResNetT-CAU. The feature representation of the vehicle image is the concatenation of the extracted global and local features. Compared with the original ResNet, the model size of ResNetT-CAU is reduced by 60% and has excellent VReID performance. We conduct experiments on two benchmark datasets, VeRi and VehicleID. The results show the proposed model stably achieves excellent VReID performance with very fast processing speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207