MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Mobile Node Assisted Localization System for Wireless Sensor Networks

2021· article· en· W3188122282 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruoyu Su, Linsey Pang, Zijun Gong, Cheng Li, Xueheng Tao, Fan Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsDroneComputer scienceWireless sensor networkReal-time computingNode (physics)Hybrid positioning systemPositioning systemSensor nodeWirelessKey distribution in wireless sensor networksWireless networkComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless sensor network (WSN), consisting of several sensor nodes, is one of the most promising technologies emerged in the past decade. The positioning system for WSN is particularly meaningful and widely used in the military surveillance, air-sea rescue, traffic monitoring, and etc. However, the traditional positioning system always suffers from deployment and maintenance of anchors. In this paper, we propose a positioning system employing a Raspberry Pi platform attached to a DJI drone as a mobile anchor. The DJI drone can serve as multiple virtual anchors by moving and broadcasting its location information periodically. Thus, it is possible to localize sensor node by itself when the sensor node collects the drone's position. A Gauss-Newton method is applied to improve the accuracy of the proposed positioning system. We also elaborate the adaption of the Gauss-Newton method with the geodetic coordinates. The goal of the proposed positioning system is to achieve higher accuracy and higher coverage at lower cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207