MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188186204 · doi:10.46219/rechiem.v13i2.88

Reimaginar el aula de matemáticas: las matemáticas escolares como praxis emancipadora

2021· article· es· W3188186204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Chilena de Educación Matemática · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPraxisPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mi propósito en este artículo es reimaginar el aula de matemáticas. Empiezo reflexionando acerca de la escuela reformada, aquella que, en Occidente, asumió la tarea de educar las nuevas generaciones para enfrentar los problemas de la industrialización hace 100 años y que, hoy, están orientadas a la producción de sujetos portadores de competencias para avanzar en el proyecto neoliberal de las sociedades de economía de mercado. En la primera parte, abordo algunos elementos que me ayudan a explicar lo que pudo haber salido mal en el proyecto de la escuela reformada occidental; en particular, busco comprender, a través de un análisis histórico-crítico, qué la ha llevado a ser un sitio de producción de sujetos alienados. La pregunta es: ¿Qué es eso que da a la escuela moderna o posmoderna su configuración actual y la mantiene allí, atada? En la segunda parte, comparto algunas ideas que hemos explorado con profesores y estudiantes de nuestras escuelas en un esfuerzo por salir de las garras de la alienación y que nos han llevado a repensar las matemáticas escolares como praxis emancipadora.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it