Aperçu du champ de la didactique des sciences humaines et sociales au primaire après la parution du rapport de la Commission Parent en 1964 au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo apresenta uma análise preliminar da literatura científica sobre o ensino das ciências humanas e sociais no ensino fundamenta (primário) publicada no Québec após a difusão do Relatório da Comissão Real de Educação em 1964. Para tanto, 83 documentos publicados ao longo dos últimos sessenta anos foram revisados por meio de uma análise temática mista de conteúdo com base nos questionamentos e no quadro conceitual que sustentam as pesquisas anteriores do autor do texto. Destaca, assim, as tendências, perspectivas, tensões e pontos de ruptura no que tange aos fundamentos e à estrutura conceitual específicos ao campo da didática das ciências humanas e sociais no Québec. Ora influenciada pelas chamadas teorias personalistas e tecnológicas, ora pela chamadas teorias construtivistas (e mesmo socioconstrutivistas), a evolução desse campo testemunha da diversidade de concepções e pontos de vista que são diretamente relacionados aos fundamentos subjacentes do pensamento daqueles que a implementam coletiva e historicamente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".