MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188593846 · doi:10.1111/oik.08512

Incongruent drivers of network, species and interaction persistence in food webs

2021· article· en· W3188593846 on OpenAlexaff
Anne M. McLeod, Shawn Leroux

Bibliographic record

VenueOikos · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersistence (discontinuity)Modularity (biology)Interaction networkFood webCompetition (biology)Ecological networkTrophic levelComplex networkBiologyEcologyComputer scienceEvolutionary biologyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Communities can be described by species, interactions and the network of interactions which emerge from these building blocks. Networks are often summarized by diverse metrics which capture key components of network topology, for example, number of trophic levels, number of interactions per species (i.e. degree) and frequency of apparent competition modules (i.e. motifs). Network metrics are often used to predict whole community responses following a perturbation. Understanding whether our predictive capabilities at the network level are maintained at other levels of organization such as species and interaction levels is critical but rarely studied. Our objective was to determine whether we can use different network metrics (e.g. modularity, species roles) to predict which networks, species and interactions will persist following a perturbation. Given the nested structure of interactions, species and networks, we hypothesized that those metrics which were correlated with network persistence would be the same metrics correlated with which species and interactions persist and that the direction of these correlations would be maintained across organizational levels (i.e. network, species and interactions). We used numerical simulations of a dynamic food web model and model selection to test the relationships between network metrics (e.g. degree, modularity, motif profiles) and network, species and interaction‐level persistence. We found that out degree and frequency of both apparent and exploitative competition were the best predictors of species persistence, however all metrics were weak predictors of species persistence. This demonstrates that metrics which predict network persistence are not always the best predictors of species and interaction level persistence. Additionally, metrics can work in opposition depending on the organizational scope examined; for example interaction strength is positively correlated with interaction persistence, but negatively correlated with species persistence. Multiscale analysis of network metrics such as this one, may provide critical insight for advancing network‐based environmental management in the Anthropocene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOikosSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207