MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188726618

주택유형별 매매가격 변동의 상호관계에 관한 실증연구 - 서울지역을 중심으로 -

2019· article· ko· W3188726618 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
서기섭, 김기홍, JaeTae Kim

Bibliographic record

Venue부동산경영 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApartmentQuarter (Canadian coin)Shock (circulatory)EconomicsEconometricsHouse priceFinancial economicsGeographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study sought to identify the characteristics of price changes between types of houses in Seoul's housing market based on the theory of housing sub-market. To this end, we secured the differentiation of the research through prior research on the housing sub-market, and established time series data from the second quarter of 2006 to the fourth quarter of 2018 for apartment prices, detached and multi-family housing prices and officetel prices in each of the five areas of Seoul using the data of 114 Reps. In addition, the EVIEWS 8.0 program resulted in the following meaningful results through empirical analysis of price fluctuation characteristics by region. First, the results of the Grandeur-In-relationship test showed that there exists a causal relationship in all five areas where apartment prices affect different price types. Second, the results of the shock response analysis and variance decomposition analysis in the five zones showed that the impact of the prices of detached and multi-family homes on apartment prices was high. Third, the results of the shock response analysis and dispersion analysis in the five areas showed that the impact of the apartment price on the officetel price was low. The significance of this study can be found in that it identified the need for various detailed studies of the housing sub-market by conducting a study on the characteristics of price changes by type of housing for the purpose of a detailed understanding of the housing market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.064

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue부동산경영Same topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207