LA LOGIQUE UTILITARISTE ET LA DÉFORMATION DES FINALITÉS DES SCIENCES HUMAINES ET SOCIALES ET DE LA SCIENCE D’ÉDUCATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte un regard critique sur la logique utilitariste qui domine actuellement les conditions humaines et sociales de vie. L’analyse se penche specifiquement sur les rapports entre cette logique et le champ de l’education et plus particulierement encore les sciences humaines et sociales qui sont largement ostracisees. Apres avoir defini ce que sont les sciences humaines et sociales et leurs apports fondamentaux a l’education scolaire, nous degageons deux grandes interpretations du domaine de l’education et de ses composantes instruction et socialisation, soit une tendance emancipatrice et une tendance conditionnante et instrumentale. Ces prealables permettent ensuite de considerer la notion d’utilitarisme dans ses li ens avec l’education et les sciences humaines et sociales, puis, en s’appuyant sur les travaux de Caille, de degager differentes conceptions de l’utilite dont certaines s’opposent a la vision economiciste. En conclusion, nous proposons un certain nombre d’axes et de principes educatifs qui pourraient soutenir une approche educative emancipatoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.033 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".