DNA barcodes enable higher taxonomic assignments in the Acari
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although mites (Acari) are abundant in many terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, their diversity is poorly understood. Since most mite species can be distinguished by variation in the DNA barcode region of cytochrome c oxidase I, the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system provides a reliable species proxy that facilitates large-scale surveys. Such analysis reveals many new BINs that can only be identified as Acari until they are examined by a taxonomic specialist. This study demonstrates that the Barcode of Life Datasystem's identification engine (BOLD ID) generally delivers correct ordinal and family assignments from both full-length DNA barcodes and their truncated versions gathered in metabarcoding studies. This result was demonstrated by examining BOLD ID's capacity to assign 7021 mite BINs to their correct order (4) and family (189). Identification success improved with sequence length and taxon coverage but varied among orders indicating the need for lineage-specific thresholds. A strict sequence similarity threshold (86.6%) prevented all ordinal misassignments and allowed the identification of 78.6% of the 7021 BINs. However, higher thresholds were required to eliminate family misassignments for Sarcoptiformes (89.9%), and Trombidiformes (91.4%), consequently reducing the proportion of BINs identified to 68.6%. Lineages with low barcode coverage in the reference library should be prioritized for barcode library expansion to improve assignment success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".