MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189014324 · doi:10.13031/aea.14445

Design and Preliminary Testing of a Pneumatic Prototype Machine to Control the Colorado Potato Beetle

2021· article· en· W3189014324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saad Almady, Mohamed Khelifi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Engineering in Agriculture · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorado potato beetleLeptinotarsaRoot cropsAgricultural engineeringPEST analysisIntegrated pest managementAirflowPest controlEnvironmental scienceEngineeringAgronomyHorticultureBiologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights A pneumatic prototype machine to control the Colorado potato beetle (CPBs) was successfully designed, built, and tested in a potato field under real conditions. The pneumatic prototype machine is effective in dislodging CPB larvae from potato plants. ABSTRACT . The Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), is a real threat to potato crops when left uncontrolled. This insect pest is hard to control because it develops resistance to most chemical insecticides. To date, several alternatives including chemical, biological, and physical methods have been used to control CPB populations but have proven to be ineffective on their own. So far, the most reliable method at short and medium scales has been the use of chemicals, i.e., spraying insecticides onto potato plants at regular intervals throughout the life cycle of the CPB. However, the overuse of chemicals due to the resistance developed by the CPB can lead to serious health and environmental problems. The use of a pneumatic method to control the CPB seems to be a viable alternative compared to the use of chemicals. For this purpose, this research focused on engineering a pneumatic control device that could allow farmers to reduce their reliance on chemical insecticides. A pneumatic prototype machine using positive air pressure to dislodge CPBs from potato plant foliage was designed and built at the Department of Soils and Agri-Food Engineering of Université Laval. This prototype was tested in the field using three airflow velocities (31, 35, and 38 m/s) and two travel speeds (5 and 6 km/h). The results indicated that the airflow velocity and travel speed have no significant impact on dislodging the CPB (p = 0.0548 and 0.7033, respectively). However, the interaction between airflow velocities and the development stages of the CPB had a significant effect on dislodging the CPB (p = 0.0194). Overall, the most adequate airflow velocity that resulted in removing most of the CPB larvae from potato leaves was 35 m/s. Obtained results indicate that this pneumatic prototype machine could be efficiently used to control the CPB. However, extensive testing is required to confirm obtained results and investigate the effects of the pneumatic control on both the potato plant growth and the yield compared to other control means. Keywords: Airflow velocity, Colorado potato beetle, Pneumatic control, Potato, Travel speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Engineering in AgricultureSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207