MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W31890396 · doi:10.7759/cureus.6192

Understanding Beer's Law: An Interactive Laboratory Presentation and Related Exercises

2014· article· en· W31890396 on OpenAlex
Rob L. Dean

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Laboratory Chemical Education · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)ComprehensionInterpretation (philosophy)Class (philosophy)Simple (philosophy)Mathematics educationComputer scienceLawPsychologyEngineering ethicsEpistemologyEngineeringPolitical scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neoplastic diseases are commonly paired with a wide range of non-specific clinical symptoms. Even the most alarming complaints pose a low positive predictive value making diagnosis of an underlying malignancy a major detective challenge for the primary care physician. Therefore, although cancer may be suspected for not be missed, as management failure within primary care, diagnosis usually occurs in the context of a secondary care setting. Here we present a case of a patient seeking medical advice from his general practitioner due to a two-week history of back thoracic pain. Following investigations, the patient was early diagnosed with myeloma. Current notion of target-driven laboratory tests utility that may be used as possible clues for the detection of multiple myeloma at a primary care level is also discussed to enhance capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it