Signatures, Lipschitz-Free Spaces, and Paths of Persistence Diagrams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
.Paths of persistence diagrams provide a summary of the dynamic topological structure of a one-parameter family of metric spaces. These summaries can be used to study and characterize the dynamic shape of data such as swarming behavior in multiagent systems, time-varying functional MRI scans from neuroscience, and time-dependent scalar fields in hydrodynamics. While persistence diagrams can provide a powerful topological summary of data, the standard space of persistence diagrams lacks the sufficient algebraic and analytic structure required for many theoretical and computational analyses. We enrich the space of persistence diagrams by isometrically embedding it into a Lipschitz-free space, a Banach space built from a universal construction. We utilize the Banach space structure to define bounded variation paths of persistence diagrams, which can be studied using the path signature, a reparametrization-invariant characterization of paths valued in a Banach space. The signature is universal and characteristic, which allow us to theoretically characterize measures on the space of paths and motivate its use in the context of kernel methods. However, kernel methods often require a feature map into a Hilbert space, so we introduce the moment map, a stable and injective feature map for static persistence diagrams, and compose it with the discrete path signature, producing a computable feature map into a Hilbert space. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our methods by applying this to a parameter estimation problem for a 3-dimensional model of swarming behavior.Keywordspath signaturepersistence diagramtopological data analysiskernel methodsMSC codes55N3160L10
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it