MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189143777 · doi:10.1039/d1lc00415h

Expanding the limits towards ‘one-pot’ DNA assembly and transformation on a rapid-prototype microfluidic device

2021· article· en· W3189143777 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Perry, Guy Soffer, Raja Jain, Steve C. C. Shih

Bibliographic record

VenueLab on a Chip · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia UniversityCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMicrofluidicsTransformation (genetics)Digital microfluidicsNanotechnologyPlasmidClosed loopEngineeringDNAComputer scienceMaterials scienceControl engineeringVoltageChemistryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. The system features a novel electrode geometry and modular design, which make these devices simple to fabricate and use, thus improving the accessibility of microfluidics. This device incorporates an impedance-based adaptive closed loop water replenishment system to compensate for droplet evaporation and maintain constant assembly reaction concentrations, which we found to be crucial to the DNA assembly efficiency. We also showcase a closed-loop temperature control system that generates precise thermodynamic profiles to optimize heat shock transformation. Moreover, we validated the system by assembling and transforming large and complex plasmids conferring a biosynthetic pathway, resulting in performance comparable to those of standard techniques. We propose that the methods described here will contribute to a new generation of accessible automation platforms aimed at speeding up the 'building' process, lowering reagent consumption and removing manual work from synthetic biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLab on a ChipSame topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207