MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189183394 · doi:10.1109/cec45853.2021.9504760

Visualizing and Characterizing the Parameter Configuration Landscape of Particle Swarm Optimization using Physical Landform Classification

2021· article· en· W3189183394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceSwarm behaviourHeuristicMulti-swarm optimizationLandformMathematical optimizationScheme (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When designing effective parameter tuning and/or self-adaptive mechanisms for meta-heuristic optimizers, any insights about the configuration process and its associated landscape are of great benefit. Recently, the parameter configuration landscape (PCL) was proposed as a mechanism to formally study and characterize the landscape induced by the control parameter values of meta-heuristic search techniques. As an extension, the use of geomorphon landform types to further characterize and visualize the PCL was recently proposed. This study adopts the geomorphon classification scheme and applies it to particle swarm optimization (PSO). The methodology is applied on 20 minimization benchmark problems with various problem dimensions and swarm sizes, thereby providing deep insights into the PCL associated with PSO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it