MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3189231049 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3067

Burst properties of the highly active FRB20201124A using uGMRT

2021· article· en· W3189231049 on OpenAlexaff
Visweshwar Ram Marthi, Suryarao Bethapudi, Robert Main, Hsiu-Hsien Lin, L. G. Spitler, Robert Wharton, Dongzi Li, T. Gautam, Ue‐Li Pen, G H Hilmarsson

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGiant Metrewave Radio TelescopeFast radio burstPower lawHaloFluenceGamma-ray burstMeasure (data warehouse)GalaxyExponential functionRadio galaxyOpticsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the observations of the highly active FRB20201124A with the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope at 550-750 MHz. These observations in the incoherent array mode simultaneously provided an arcsecond localization of bursts from FRB20201124A, the discovery of persistent radio emission associated with the host galaxy, and the detection of 48 bursts. Using the brightest burst in the sample (F = 108 Jy ms) we find a structure-maximizing dispersion measure of 410.8 ± 0.5 pc cm−3. We find that our observations are complete down to a fluence level of 10 Jy ms, above which the cumulative burst rate scales as a power-law R( > F) = 10 hr−1(F/10 Jy ms)γ with γ = −1.2 ± 0.2. We find that the bursts are on average wider than those reported for other repeating FRBs. We find that the waiting time between bursts is well approximated by an exponential distribution with a mean of ∼2.9 min during our observations. We searched for periodicities using both a standard Fourier domain method and the Fast Folding Algorithm, but found no significant candidates. We measure bulk spectro-temporal drift rates between −0.75 and −20 MHz ms−1. Finally, we use the brightest burst to set an upper limit to the scattering time of 11.1 ms at 550 MHz. The localization of FRB20201124A adds strength to the proof-of-concept method described in our earlier work and serves as a potential model for future localizations and follow-up of repeating FRBs with the uGMRT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→