MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189298438 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.04944

Estimating the Steady State Diffusion Coefficient Using Data from the Transient Anomalous Regime

2021· preprint· en· W3189298438 on OpenAlex
Nicholas Ilow, Gary W. Slater

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteady state (chemistry)Transient (computer programming)Anomalous diffusionScalingDiffusionMean squared displacementExponentPhysicsStatistical physicsDisplacement (psychology)Transient stateSquare latticeMathematicsThermodynamicsChemistryQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceMolecular dynamicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When particles/molecules diffuse in systems that contain obstacles, the steady-state regime (during which the mean-square displacement scales linearly with time, $\left< r^2 \right> \sim t$) is preceded by a transient regime. It is common to characterize this transient regime using the concept of anomalous (sub)diffusion with the scaling law $\left< r^2 \right> \sim t^α$, where the corresponding exponent $α<1$. We propose a new method to estimate the critical time $t^*$ that marks the transition between these two regimes. The method uses short-time data from the transient regime to estimate $t^*$, which can then be used to estimate the steady-state diffusion coefficient $D$. In other words, we propose a procedure that makes it possible to estimate the steady state diffusion coefficient without reaching the steady-state. We test the procedure with various two-dimensional lattice systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it