MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189347711 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500559

A Dynamic Pricing Based Scheduling Scheme for Electric Vehicles as Mobile Energy Storages

2021· article· en· W3189347711 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Chen, Mushu Li, Miao Wang, Zhou Su, LI Jun-ling, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy storageDynamic pricingElectric vehicleScheduling (production processes)Automotive engineeringReal-time computingSimulationPower (physics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rechargeable battery of a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) endows the PEV with dual roles in the power grid as power load and mobile energy storage (MES). Owing to the technical advancement of autonomous driving, private PEVs that are parked most of the day can be used as private MESs (PMESs) to autonomously deliver energy for overloaded charging stations (CSs). In this paper, we investigate an energy compensation problem where PMESs are scheduled to deliver energy to overloaded CSs so that the energy balance can be achieved while the energy delivery time can be minimized. Based on the time-variant CS operation status and traffic conditions, we propose a pricing-based scheduling scheme that considers both PMES navigation and incentive price design. First, to navigate PMESs in the energy-capacitated transportation system, a minimum-cost flow problem is formulated to minimize the energy delivery time. Then, the incentive price is determined to encourage PMESs to follow the optimal navigation results for energy delivery. Simulations are conducted based on the traffic data of California highway to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheduling scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207