Regulation response of pilot-operated diaphragm type pressure-reducing valves: laboratory testing and impact on the performance of pressure control modes in water distribution systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pressure control is recognized as an efficient measure for reducing leaks from water distribution systems. We have evaluated the effectiveness of various pressure control modes by means of pilot-operated diaphragm type pressure-reducing valves (PRVs), taking into account the sensitivity of the valves to various settings. First, the response of a PRV to consecutive pressure settings variations was experimentally evaluated in the hydraulic simulation laboratory of National Institute for Scientific Research. These experiments revealed that the studied valve only reacts when variation in the pressure setting corresponds to at least a 1/6 turn of the pilot valve. Second, an actual case study from Quebec City, Canada, was simulated to evaluate the impact of the PRV response on three pressure control modes: fixed control, time-based control, and real-time control (RTC). The results show that RTC of pressure leads to reductions in leakage rate for the studied network but that the PRV operational constraints limit the expected performance of RTC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".