MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Full-Duplex Relaying based on Distributed Decoding in OFDM Systems

2021· article· en· W3189420658 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Rahmati, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRetransmissionDecoding methodsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingNode (physics)Computer networkOverhead (engineering)Bandwidth (computing)AlgorithmEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retransmission of user's data at partner node in repetition based cooperative protocols decreases bandwidth efficiency and imposes overhead on cooperative signalling. In this paper we propose two full-duplex distributed cooperative protocols for OFDM systems, that improve BER performance and decrease overhead without any hardware changes in comparison with the conventional cooperative protocols. In the proposed full-duplex distributed cooperative system, the partner node retransmits a part of the information on high quality subcarriers that belong to the user's data instead of all received ones. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is presented to reveal the superior performance of the distributed decoding system as compared to that of the conventional cooperative schemes for the OFDM scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207