A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of currently used treatment modalities in the treatment of patients with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: PIK3CA (activating mutations of the p110α subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases)-related overgrowth spectrums (PROS) include a variety of clinical presentations that are associated with hypertrophy of different parts of the body. We performed a systematic literature review to assess the current treatment options and their efficacy and safety for PROS. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar to retrieve studies on the treatment of hypertrophy in PROS. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series with ≥10 patients were included in the present review. The titles, abstracts, and full text were assessed by two reviewers independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: We included 16 studies of the treatment of hypertrophy in PROS patients, 13 (81.3%) from clinical retrospective studies and 3 (13.7%) from prospective cohort studies. The risk of bias grade was low for 2, medium for 12, and high for 2 studies. Of the 16 studies, 13 reported on surgical treatment and 3 reported pharmacologic treatment using phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway inhibitors in PROS patients. In 3 studies, PROS was defined by a mutation in the PIK3CA gene, and 13 studies relied on a clinical definition of PROS. Surgical therapy was beneficial for a specific subgroup of PROS (macrodactyly). However, little has been reported concerning surgery and the potential benefits for other PROS entities. The reported side effects after surgical therapy were mostly prolonged wound healing or scarring. PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition was beneficial in patients with PROS by reducing hypertrophy and systemic symptoms. The adverse effects reported included infection, changes in blood count, liver enzymes, and metabolic measures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is a locally limited treatment option for specific types of PROS. A promising treatment option for PROS is pharmacologic PIK3CA inhibition. However, the level of evidence on the treatment of overgrowth in PROS patients is limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".