État, langues, antinomie. La dynamique ethnolibérale des réformes institutionnelles en Belgique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explique comment l’État belge en est venu à réunir dans une seule structure trois modèles étatiques qui privilégient respectivement le niveau national, le niveau infranational et le niveau supranational. Sa première partie, à la fois historique et théorique, présente la genèse de cet État, qui est abordée à travers le concept d’antinomie. Les trois parties suivantes étudient les effets de l’antinomie sur les institutions belges, sur la gestion par l’État des autonomismes « flamand » et « wallon » et, enfin, sur sa politique socio-économique depuis les années 1960. Une dernière partie s’arrête brièvement aux rapports dialectiques entre cette politique, qualifiée ici d’ethnolibérale, et la « construction européenne ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".