Corrigendum to: Ashamed and Alone—Risk Factors for Alcohol Craving Among Depressed Emerging Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the originally published version of this manuscript, there were errors in lines 13 and 14 of Table 1. Line 13 should read ``Social condition'' and the mean value should be 3.13. For reference, the corrected Table 1 follows. These details have been corrected only in this corrigendum to preserve the published version of record. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations Note. M, means; SD, standard deviation. Min - Max, minimum – maximum; Post-shame and post-guilt refer to the ratings of emotions after engaging in the shame induction task. Post-alcohol craving refers to craving after the cue-exposure. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations Note. M, means; SD, standard deviation. Min - Max, minimum – maximum; Post-shame and post-guilt refer to the ratings of emotions after engaging in the shame induction task. Post-alcohol craving refers to craving after the cue-exposure. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. Additionally, the results under the Hypothesis Testing section on Pages 3 and 4 have been modified to the appropriate decimal placements. For reference, the corrected paragraphs follow. Figure 1 presents the results from our primary moderated mediation model. We found that depression was a positive predictor of self-reported post-task shame. As hypothesized, we also found support that the effect of post-task shame on post-cue alcohol craving depended on social context condition. Specifically, there was a supported indirect effect of depression on alcohol craving through shame, but only when conditioned on the solitary condition (b = 0.0170, 95% CI [.0036, .0351]) and not the social condition (b = −0.0015, 95% CI [ −.0166, .0157]). Overall, these results suggest that increases in shame may help explain why depressed emerging adults crave alcohol when alone (versus when in the presence of others). We ran an opposing model with guilt as mediator (see Figure 2). In this model, depression was a positive predictor of self-reported post-task guilt. However, we did not find support for an overall association between post-task guilt and post-cue alcohol craving and this association was not moderated by social context condition (solitary condition [b = 0.0076, 95% CI { −.0035, .0213}]; social condition [b = −0.0038, 95% CI { −.0155, .0083}]). This suggests that shame (and not guilt) is a central emotional mechanism underlying depression-related solitary drinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".