MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189558819 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500795

A Novel Privacy-Preserving Neural Network Computing Approach for E-Health Information System

2021· article· en· W3189558819 on OpenAlexaff
Yingying Yao, Zhendong Zhao, Xiaolin Chang, Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić, Jianhua Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomomorphic encryptionComputer scienceCloud computingEncryptionInformation privacyCollusionComputer securityHealth informaticsHealth careData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic health (e-health) information system relies on cloud computing technologies to provide massive medical data computing and storage services. Especially, the recently proposed Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) on these medical data can not only effectively improve the healthcare service quality, but also support the end users with limited computing resources. However, MLaaS on the massive medical data faces the challenge of privacy. Homomorphic encryption technology has been explored to assure the privacy of medical data owners in MLaaS but with the weaknesses of limited homomorphic operations and low efficiency. To alleviate these weaknesses, this paper proposes a novel privacy-preserving non-collusion dualcloud (NCDC) model-based e-health information system using neural network (NN) computing. The system can not only assure medical data privacy through adopting homomorphic encryption technology but also assure NN model privacy by adding fake neurons to the NN. In addition, the proposed e-health information system also has the following advantages: (i) Simple key generation. (ii) No constraint on the size of medical data to be encrypted. (iii) The less loss of prediction accuracy between encrypted and original medical data. (iv) Supporting more homomorphic operations and having better computing efficiency through experiment verification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207