A Novel Privacy-Preserving Neural Network Computing Approach for E-Health Information System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electronic health (e-health) information system relies on cloud computing technologies to provide massive medical data computing and storage services. Especially, the recently proposed Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) on these medical data can not only effectively improve the healthcare service quality, but also support the end users with limited computing resources. However, MLaaS on the massive medical data faces the challenge of privacy. Homomorphic encryption technology has been explored to assure the privacy of medical data owners in MLaaS but with the weaknesses of limited homomorphic operations and low efficiency. To alleviate these weaknesses, this paper proposes a novel privacy-preserving non-collusion dualcloud (NCDC) model-based e-health information system using neural network (NN) computing. The system can not only assure medical data privacy through adopting homomorphic encryption technology but also assure NN model privacy by adding fake neurons to the NN. In addition, the proposed e-health information system also has the following advantages: (i) Simple key generation. (ii) No constraint on the size of medical data to be encrypted. (iii) The less loss of prediction accuracy between encrypted and original medical data. (iv) Supporting more homomorphic operations and having better computing efficiency through experiment verification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".