MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QoS-aware Energy Saving Scheme and Traffic Management in Mobile Edge Computing Networks

2021· article· en· W3189560184 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Alnoman, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of serviceComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkScheme (mathematics)Mobile edge computingTask (project management)Distributed computingFlexibility (engineering)ServerEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an energy saving scheme is presented whereby unused virtual machines (VMs) in distributed edge devices enter a sleep mode taking into account the quality of service (QoS) experienced by mobile users. The virtual machines in the system under consideration form a shared VM pool assisted by the software-defined networking (SDN) technology. The energy saving optimization problem aims to minimize the number of active VMs without violating the QoS requirements, and is solved using the square-root staffing rule and the Halfin-Whitt function. In addition, a traffic management strategy in overloaded edge devices is carried out to maximize the number of accommodated users taking into account the fronthaul capacity which impacts task migration among edge devices. Results show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in saving remarkable amount of energy while satisfying the QoS requirements. It is also shown that the VM sleeping scheme exhibits higher energy saving and less task migration compared to the entire edge device sleeping scheme due to its enhanced flexibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207