MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189615288 · doi:10.53111/estagus.v55i3.54

Los Herodianos y el fiscus Iudaicus en Mc 12,13-17

2021· article· es· W3189615288 on OpenAlexaff
David Álvarez Cineira

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudio Agustiniano · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersLunds UniversitetUniversity of OxfordIsrael Academy of Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of CambridgeYeshiva University
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La identidad de los herodianos en Mc 12,13 vinculados a la recaudación de impuestos para el César ha constituido un puzzle para los eruditos. Su carácter redaccional nos invita a estudiar la perícopa en el contexto vital del evangelista, el cual se sitúa en Roma tras la destrucción del Templo de Jerusalén. Con la imposición del fiscus Iudaicus, los dirigentes de la sinagoga romana de los “herodianos” probablemente jugaron un papel relevante en la confección del censo de los contribuyentes al fiscus Iudaicus, exigiendo ese impuesto a los judeocristianos. Este grupo se debatía en el dilema de “¿pagamos o no pagamos?” (Mc 12,14), situación a la que el evangelista responde con una disputa de Jesús con los fariseos sobre la licitud del pago del impuesto de capitación.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.021
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudio AgustinianoSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207