MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189685564 · doi:10.1101/2021.08.04.455143

The genetic etiology of longitudinal measures of predicted brain ageing in a population-based sample of mid to late-age males

2021· preprint· en· W3189685564 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nathan A. Gillespie, Sean N. Hatton, Donald H Hagler, Anders M. Dale, Jeremy A. Elman, Linda K. McEvoy, Lisa T Elyer, Christine Fennema‐Notestine, Mark W. Logue, Ruth McKenzie, Olivia K. Puckett, Xin Tu, Nathan Whitsel, Hong Xian, Chandra A. Reynolds, Matthew S. Panizzon, Michael J. Lyons, Michael C. Neale, William S. Kremen, Carol E. Franz

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthTemple UniversityU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsHeritabilityEtiologyAgeingTwin studyDemographyGenetic correlationMultivariate statisticsLongitudinal studyLongitudinal sampleMultivariate analysisBiologyPopulationGenetic modelGenetic variationDevelopmental psychologyPsychologyGeneticsMedicineInternal medicineStatisticsPathologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite their increasing application, the genetic and environmental etiology of global predicted brain ageing (PBA) indices is unknown. Likewise, the degree to which genetic influences in PBA are longitudinally stable and how PBA changes over time are also unknown. We analyzed data from 734 men from the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging with repeated MRI assessments between the ages 52 to 72 years. Biometrical genetic analyses revealed significant and highly correlated estimates of additive genetic heritability ranging from 59% to 75%. Multivariate longitudinal modelling revealed that covariation between PBA at different timepoints could be explained by a single latent factor with 73% heritability. Our results suggest that genetic influences on PBA are detectable in midlife or earlier, are longitudinally very stable, and are largely explained by common genetic influences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207