MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189765281 · doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2021.06.007

Global Policy Barriers and Enablers to Exercise and Physical Activity in Kidney Care

2021· article· en· W3189765281 on OpenAlex
Paul N. Bennett, Masahiro Kohzuki, Clara Bohm, Baback Roshanravan, Stephan J. L. Bakker, João L. Viana, Jennifer M. MacRae, Thomas J. Wilkinson, Kenneth R. Wilund, Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck, Giorgos K. Sakkas, Stefan Mustata, Kevin Fowler, Jamie McDonald, Geovana Martin Aleamañy, K. Anding, Keith G. Avin, Gabriela Leal Escobar, Iwona Gabrys, Jill Goth, M. Isnard, Manisha Jhamb, Jun Chul Kim, John Wing Li, Courtney J. Lightfoot, Mara McAdams‐DeMarco, Fabio Manfredini, Anthony Meade, Stig Mølsted, Kristen Parker, Eva Seguri-Orti, Alice C. Smith, Nancy Verdin, Jing Zheng, Deb Zimmerman, Stephanie Thompson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Renal Nutrition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaRed Deer PolytechnicAlberta Kidney Disease NetworkUniversity of Alberta HospitalKidney Foundation of CanadaAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of CalgaryOttawa HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research CentreNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDialysis Clinics
KeywordsMedicinePhysical activityNursingPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it