MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189833378 · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1cb9

Human influence on daily temperature variability over land

2021· article· en· W3189833378 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Wan, Megan C. Kirchmeier‐Young, Xuebin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorthern HemisphereLatitudeClimatologyEnvironmental scienceForcing (mathematics)Climate changeBorealSouthern HemispherePhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesGeographyEcologyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Changes in day-to-day (daily) temperature variability have implications for the health of humans and other species and industries such as agriculture. The strongest historical changes in daily temperature variability are decreases in the northern high latitudes annually and in all seasons except summer. Additionally, daily temperature variability has increased in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes during summer and over tropical and Southern Hemisphere land areas. These patterns are projected to continue with additional warming. We conduct a formal detection and attribution analysis, finding the global spatio-temporal changes in daily temperature standard deviation annually and for all seasons except boreal summer are attributable to anthropogenic forcing. Human influence is also detected in some individual 20-degree latitude bands, including the northern high latitudes. Attribution results are generally robust to different methodological choices and this provides confidence in projected changes in daily temperature variability with continued anthropogenic warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research LettersSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207