MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189850282 · doi:10.1142/s0219720021400096

Small parsimony for natural genomes in the DCJ-indel model

2021· preprint· en· W3189850282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenome Rearrangement Algorithms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndelGenomePhylogenetic treeTree (set theory)Maximum parsimonyBiologyGene duplicationComputational biologyGeneEvolutionary biologyGeneticsComputer scienceAlgorithmCombinatoricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Small Parsimony Problem (SPP) aims at finding the gene orders at internal nodes of a given phylogenetic tree such that the overall genome rearrangement distance along the tree branches is minimized. This problem is intractable in most genome rearrangement models, especially when gene duplication and loss are considered. In this work, we describe an Integer Linear Program algorithm to solve the SPP for natural genomes, i.e. genomes that contain conserved, unique, and duplicated markers. The evolutionary model that we consider is the DCJ-indel model that includes the Double-Cut and Join rearrangement operation and the insertion and deletion of genome segments. We evaluate our algorithm on simulated data and show that it is able to reconstruct very efficiently and accurately ancestral gene orders in a very comprehensive evolutionary model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it