MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189892866 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2021.36989

Mask Detection Application

2021· article· en· W3189892866 on OpenAlexaff
L. Srinivasan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUploadIdentification (biology)Computer scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Face (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakInternet privacyComputer securityArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Virology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With covid-19 being on the Rise we needed an efficient way to take care of the growing coronavirus cases. Various Tools and techniques are used to curb the spread of the virus this project aims to develop an application that helps in detecting and identifying the individuals that are not wearing a proper face mask when out in public. The photograph is taken and uploaded there is a huge data base of individual's information for example their name, semester, identification number, university seat number, branch etc. the photographs are run through the database to identify the persons without wearing a mask using facial recognition in this application can be very effectively used to curb the cases of Corona since it identifies the mask defaulters and thus we can help in controlling the infection and the spread of the virus and save many lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologySame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207