MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189898124 · doi:10.1109/jestie.2021.3103678

Digital Regulation of Wireless Power Transfer Systems Using an Embedded Lock-In Amplifier

2021· article· en· W3189898124 on OpenAlexafffund
Aaron Troy, Francisco Paz, Martin Ordonez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Output impedanceWireless power transferMaximum power transfer theoremCompensation (psychology)AmplifierElectrical impedancePower (physics)EngineeringWirelessElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-performance operation of inductive wireless power transfer (WPT) systems requires judicious tuning of the inverter connected to the transmission hardware for high-performance operation and reliability. In many applications, disturbances to both the coupling condition and the secondary-side load reshape the system dynamics, motivating the design of closed-loop regulation and impedance detection techniques. Although several analog methods have been presented, they require multiple additional components and are dependent upon fixed component values and operating frequency. In this article, a novel digital approach is presented for use in series–series compensated WPT systems. The proposed system extracts both the phase and the magnitude of the primary current in real time. Through closed-loop regulation, zero-voltage switching is sustained without additional compensation components, while the output current is controlled. By utilizing a digital framework, no additional analog components are required, improving system reliability and cost. The state identification method is self-tuning, providing robust suppression of switching noise even with a variable switching frequency. A computationally efficient construction ensures a fast converging measurement and enables high-frequency operation. Analysis, simulations, and experimental results are included to comprehensively verify these characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial ElectronicsSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207