RS-Lane: A Robust Lane Detection Method Based on ResNeSt and Self-Attention Distillation for Challenging Traffic Situations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lane detection plays an essential part in advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving systems. However, lane detection is affected by many factors such as some challenging traffic situations. Multilane detection is also very important. To solve these problems, we proposed a lane detection method based on instance segmentation, named RS-Lane. This method is based on LaneNet and uses Split Attention proposed by ResNeSt to improve the feature representation on slender and sparse annotations like lane markings. We also use Self-Attention Distillation to enhance the feature representation capabilities of the network without adding inference time. RS-Lane can detect lanes without number limits. The tests on TuSimple and CULane datasets show that RS-Lane has achieved comparable results with SOTA and has improved in challenging traffic situations such as no line, dazzle light, and shadow. This research provides a reference for the application of lane detection in autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".