MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189967260 · doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1239-9

21st ESICM Annual Congress

2008· article· en· W3189967260 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIntensive Care Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingLeibniz-GemeinschaftCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEuropean Society of Intensive Care MedicineSri Ramachandra UniversityRWTH Aachen UniversityConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoAssistance publique-Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity of MadrasEli Lilly and CompanyOklahoma Medical Research FoundationInstituto de Salud Carlos IIISocietà Italiana Anestesia, Analgesia, Rianimazione e Terapia IntensivaUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversity College LondonSundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
KeywordsMedicinePain medicineAnesthesiologyFamily medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION.Host infection by pathogens triggers an innate immune response leading to a systemic inflammatory response, often followed by an immune dysfunction which can favour the emergence of secondary infections.Dendritic cells (DCs) have a unique ability to link innate and adaptive immunity and may be centrally involved in the regulation of sepsis-induced immune suppression.We previously reported that polymicrobial sepsis durably affects the functions of DCs and confers long-term susceptibility to P. aeruginosa pneumonia.In this study, we assessed the contribution of DCs to lung defence towards secondary P. aeruginosa pneumonia. METHODS.We used a murine model of sublethal polymicrobial sepsis through cecal ligature and puncture (CLP).In this model, a short course of antibiotics and volume resuscitation allows long-term survival of 70% of mice.Eight days after CLP, we induced a secondary pneumonia through intratracheal instillation of P. aeruginosa (serotype PAO1) in post-septic mice.Bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) were generated through 7-day culture of medullar progenitors in medium supplemented with GM-CSF.Concomitant to bacterial inoculation, we intratracheally administrated exogenous BMDCs into post-septic mice.Bacterial lung clearance was evaluated through quantitative culture of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid.The lung response was assessed 4 and 24 hours after instillation through quantification of protein level, inflammatory cells, myeloperoxydase (MPO) activity and cytokine levels in the BAL fluid.RESULTS.After intratracheal instillation of 5x10 6 CFUs of P. aeruginosa, all sham-operated mice survived while post-septic mice displayed high susceptibility with a 80-percent mortality rate.As compared to sham-operated mice, post-septic mice displayed marked lung damage with early recruitment of neutrophils, cytokine imbalance with decreased IL-12p70 production and increased IL-10 release, but no defective bacterial lung clearance.Co-administration of 10 6 exogenous BMDCs into post-septic mice challenged with P. aeruginosa dramatically improved the survival rate to 70%.Intratracheal instillation of BMDCs did not improve bacterial clearance, but delayed neutrophil recruitment and subsequently reduced the MPO activity in BAL fluid.In addition, BMDCs strongly attenuated the early peak of TNF-alpha and restored a positive Il-12p70/IL-10 balance.CONCLUSION.Adoptive transfer of BMDCs reverses sepsis-induced immune suppression in a relevant model of secondary P. aeruginosa pneumonia.Unexpectedly, the mechanism of action of BMDCs did not involve enhanced antibacterial activity, but occurred by dampening the pulmonary inflammatory response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4610.333

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntensive Care MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207