Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A common refrain in the on-going and now accelerating right-wing populist attacks on LGBTQ+ existence around the world is the idea that, no matter where they are, members of the LGBTQ+ community do not belong.They are characterized as external corrupting (even colonizing) influences who have no place in the pure nation-state.The history of their presence within the nation is dismissed as wishful thinking on the part of those with the effrontery to advance a progressive agenda. 1 Right-wing populist claims along these lines dictate that the nation must alwaysalreadybe heterosexual.Such narratives are currently undergoing a dangerous resurgence, but nation-based homophobia and misogyny is nothing new.For well over a hundred years, the challenge for women who desired other women was to find a 'nation' of their own and to reach out to others with whom they might forge a sense of belonging, whether these others had existed in a former time period or they currently dwelt in a different part of the globe.At the heart of the idea (if not necessarily the execution) of 'lesbian nation' was a dual process.One part of this process constituted an attempt to establish a sense of shared community or distinct /
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it