MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189986588

Impact of Promised-Delivery-Time on Imported Vaccine Provider’s Agency Marketing Strategy

2021· article· en· W3189986588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Baozhuang Niu, Fanzhuo Zeng, Lei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessAgency (philosophy)MarketingQuality (philosophy)Service providerMarketing strategyAdvertisingService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To ensure the imported vaccines’ high quality, many countries such as Canada, the UK and China require the imported vaccine provider to cooperate with an exclusive domestic agent for vaccine sales. In this paper, we examine the role of promised-deliver-time (PDT) for the transport of vaccines in the imported vaccine provider’s agent selection: It can either rely on a non-competitive domestic agent (referred to as Pure Agent Marketing Strategy) or a rival domestic agent (referred to as Rival Agent Marketing Strategy) that produces and sells its self-branded vaccines. PDT is made by the logistics service provider (LSP), which helps keep the high quality of the imported vaccines but also significantly constrains the delivery volume. This further alters the imported vaccine provider’s agency marketing strategy. Interestingly, we find that the Rival Agent Marketing Strategy is not necessarily harmful for the imported vaccine provider, especially when the imported vaccine’s brand image advantage is significant and the PDT is long. We further study the impact of the brand substitutability and the imported vaccine provider’s social responsibility, finding that the main results are qualitatively unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicConsumer Market Behavior and PricingFrench-language works237,207