GCN-Based Pavement Crack Detection Using Mobile LiDAR Point Clouds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) system can provide high-density and accurate 3D point clouds that enable rapid pavement crack detection for road maintenance tasks. Supervised learning-based algorithms have been proved pretty effective for handling such a large amount of inhomogeneous and unstructured point clouds. However, these algorithms often rely on a lot of annotated data, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. This paper presents a semi-supervised point-level approach to overcome this challenge. We propose a graph-widen module to construct a reasonable graph structure for point clouds, increasing the detection performance of graph convolutional networks (GCN). The constructed graph characterizes the local features from a small amount of annotated data, avoiding information loss and dramatically reduces the dependence on annotated data. The MLS point clouds acquired by a commercial RIEGL VMX-450 system are used in this study. The experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art point-level methods in terms of recall, F1 score, and efficiency while achieving comparable accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it