MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190015512 · doi:10.7759/cureus.17047

Owren's Disease: A Rare Deficiency

2021· article· en· W3190015512 on OpenAlexaff
Madiha Ehtisham, Muhammad Shafiq, Muhammad Shafique, Hassan Mumtaz, Muhammad Naveed Shahzad

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemostasis and retained surgical items
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePartial thromboplastin timeFactor XIFactor XProthrombin timeInternal medicineClotting factorGastroenterologyFactor VFresh frozen plasmaRare diseaseDiseasePediatricsCoagulationPlateletThrombinThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Factor V deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder, which may be due to acquired inhibitors or biallelic mutations. Factor V deficiency due to homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation (also known as Owren's disease or parahemophilia) has an estimated prevalence of one in one million people. A 22-year-old female was admitted for evaluation of longstanding menorrhagia. Anatomic abnormalities were excluded, and prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were identified. Mixing studies followed by specific factor assays and genetic testing enable identification of factor V deficiency, for which fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or factor V concentrates are therapeutic. Specific clotting factor assay followed by mixing studies and genetic studies is essential for the diagnosis of congenital factor V deficiency. Deranged PT and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) with normal factor I level must be evaluated for the disorder of clotting factors and must be managed by FFP administration or plasma-derived factor V concentrate wherever available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicHemostasis and retained surgical itemsFrench-language works237,207