MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190199533 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500783

A Scalable BP Method for Joint Localization and Synchronization in Dense Wireless Sensor Networks

2021· article· en· W3190199533 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Qiu, Xianbin Wang, Weiming Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)ScalabilityBelief propagationSynchronization (alternating current)ComputationWirelessCovarianceComputational complexity theoryAlgorithmReal-time computingComputer networkMathematicsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a joint cooperative localization and synchronization scheme for dense mobile wireless sensor networks (WSNs) using a scalable belief propagation (BP) based method. We consider a distributed time-varying WSN with mobile devices, where message packets are propagated among all devices starting from temporal and spatial anchors. To account for the nonlinear system models and to compute the belief at each device while maintaining low communication and computation complexity, we propose an efficient scalable BP scheme, where a temporary posterior belief is calculated and updated sequentially so that the dimension of measurement covariance matrices is fixed instead of the unlimited dimension augmentation and batch computation in sigma point belief propagation (SPBP). Simulation results demonstrate a significant enhancement on the robustness of the algorithm and reduction of the computational complexity compared to the baseline scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207